Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact
Advanced Search…
Sections
  • Campaigns
  • Chemicals of Concern
  • Healthy Living
  • Research
  • Get Involved
  • ToxicsWAtch Blog
Personal tools
You are here: Home → ToxicsWAtch Blog → A Revolving Door Of Chemicals
redgetinvbox_03.png redgetinvside_04.png
redgetinvbox_06.png redgetinvside_07.png
redgetinvbox_07.png redgetinvside_09.png
  
redgetinvside_11.png
redgetinvbox_09.png redgetinvside_13.png
redgetinvbox_10.pngredgetinvbox_11.pngredgetinvbox_12.png redgetinvside_17.png
Recent Blogs
Our Water, Ourselves
Does That Formula Come With A Side Of Arsenic?
All's NOT Fair In Love And War
Raise A Glass To Clean Water!
Healthy Holiday Gift Guide 2011
Blogs We Like

Cold Truth

Dateline Earth

Earth Ministry

EcoConsumer Blog

Faith and Environment Network

Groundwire Blog

MomsRising

People For Puget Sound

Publicola

Safer States

Sightline - The Daily Score

Watching Our Waterways

 
Info

A Revolving Door Of Chemicals

— filed under: Congress, Clean and Healthy Waters, PBTs, Clean Water, Toxic Flame Retardants, Governor Gregoire

The leadership of Washington’s Legislature may have averted catastrophe by stopping the exponential increases in PBDE levels in fish, wildlife, and people. Unfortunately, industry’s response to the phaseouts has been to replace the PBDEs with largely similar chemicals.

A Revolving Door Of Chemicals

Editors Note: This is the third post in our special blog series, A Fireproof Puget Sound. Part one chronicled the impacts of toxic flame retardants on Puget Sound's wildlife, especially its killer whales. Part two looked at how the Sound's topography makes its wildlife even more vulnerable to toxic chemicals, including toxic flame retardants. Now we look at how one group of toxic flame retardants (PBDEs) is on their way out but another equally toxic set is already taking their place.

PBDEs had a solid run at the top of the flame-retardant heap, but had their troubles in this century. In 2004, industry voluntarily ceased production of two forms, the penta and octa formulations, after research showed unexpectedly high levels in the breastmilk of U.S. women. The most widely used form, the deca formulation, started to head out the door when the Washington State Legislature banned it for most uses in 2007. Several other states followed Washington’s lead with bans, and the nation’s only manufacturers and largest importer have now agreed to a phaseout that eliminates most uses by the end of next year and all uses by the end of 2013.

The leadership of Washington’s Legislature may have averted catastrophe by stopping the exponential increases in PBDE levels in fish, wildlife, and people.

 

 

 

nopbdesUnfortunately, industry’s response to the phaseouts has been to replace the PBDEs with largely similar chemicals, also based on bromine. Two popular replacements for penta-BDE’s use in foam are chlorinated tris and Firemaster 550. Chlorinated tris was removed from children’s pajamas in 1978 after it was determined to be a mutagen, and it was subsequently designated a probable human carcinogen[1]. Firemaster 550 contains two different compounds based on bromine chemistry, one of which is a brominated version of the hormone-disrupting phthalate DEHP, and the other of which is similar to DEHP’s breakdown product MEHP. These chemicals have already been shown to have the capacity to damage DNA in fish[2].

One of the main replacements for deca-BDE is a nearly identical brominated compound named decabromodiphenylethane, or DBDPE. This chemical has already been found in air, water, sewage sludge, sediment, and aquatic life. Disturbingly, a study in the Great Lakes region found that in some instances its levels exceeded those of deca in herring gull eggs, suggesting it may have more capacity to build up in the environment and in animals[3]. 

Washington State and EPA’s Design for the Environment program have both analyzed the alternatives to PBDEs for health and safety, and identified safer options. But with no requirement for industry to adopt those alternatives, it is likely the future will bring increased levels of toxic substitutes in both the indoor and outdoor environments.

Gregoire signs Children's Safe Products Act ClippingWashington does have the opportunity to provide leadership once again. Under the Children’s Safe Products Act of 2008, our state agencies will soon start collecting information on the presence of some of these replacements in children’s products. Our state will then have more information than any other, and the opportunity to act to require that the safest alternatives—those that don’t threaten human health, or the health of Puget Sound—be used.

An ultimate solution to this dilemma requires Congress to update the Toxic Substances Control Act, the woefully out-of-date law that governs chemical use in the U.S. As part of the Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families coalition, we’re asking Congress to update the law to phase out chemicals like PBDEs that persist and build up in the environment, fish, and wildlife and ensure that only the safest replacements are used. Senator Frank Lautenberg has introduced a bill to update the law, and hundreds of organizations from around the country are asking Congress to act swiftly to pass legislation that ensures only the safest chemicals are used.

You can help too by asking Washington's Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell to co-sponsor the Save Chemicals Act.  Here's how.

Other posts in the series

Part 1: From Your Couch To The Sound: The impact of toxic flame retardants of Puget Sound's wildlife, especially its killer whales

Part 2: Toxic Isolation: How Puget Sound's topography leaves its wildlife even more vulnerable to toxic chemicals like flame retardants.

Click here to check out more posts in our series about toxic chemicals affecting Puget Sound.

 

Photo Attributions:
Revolving door courtesy of Flickr User Your Girl In Portland

Notes:

1. Shaw, S., A Blum, R Weber, K Kannan, D Rich, D Lucas, CP Koshland, D Dobraca, S Hanson, and LS Birnbaum, Halogenated Flame Retardants: Do the Fire Safety Benefits Justify the Risks? Reviews on Environmental Health, 2010. 25(4): p. 261-305.

2. Bearr, J., HM Stapleton, and CL Mitchelmore, Accumulation and DNA damage in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to 2 brominated flame-retardant mixtures, Firemaster® 550 and Firemaster® BZ-54. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2010. 29(3): p. 722-729.

3. Gauthier, L., D Potter, CE Hebert, and RJ Letcher, Temporal Trends and Spatial Distribution of Non-polybrominated Diphenyl Ether Flame Retardants in the Eggs of Colonial Populations of Great Lakes Herring Gulls. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009. 43: p. 312-317.

Document Actions
  • Email this page
  • Print this
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
Washington Toxics Coalition
4649 Sunnyside Avenue N, Suite 540, Seattle, WA 98103
(206) 632-1545 : webmaster@watoxics.org
powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and served with clean energy