Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Take Action
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Contact
Advanced Search…
Sections
  • Campaigns
  • Chemicals of Concern
  • Healthy Living
  • Research
  • Get Involved
  • ToxicsWAtch Blog
Personal tools
You are here: Home → ToxicsWAtch Blog → Reading, writing, and toxic chemicals
redgetinvbox_03.png redgetinvside_04.png
redgetinvbox_06.png redgetinvside_07.png
redgetinvbox_07.png redgetinvside_09.png
  
redgetinvside_11.png
redgetinvbox_09.png redgetinvside_13.png
redgetinvbox_10.pngredgetinvbox_11.pngredgetinvbox_12.png redgetinvside_17.png
Recent Blogs
We’re Ready For Round 2
Walmart: Put Your Money Where Your Chemicals Are
Let's Jump Off The Toxic Treadmill
The Toxic-Free Kids and Families Act Is On Its Way!
The Chemical Industry's Opposition A Lot Like Groundhog Day
Blogs We Like

Blubberblog

Cold Truth

Dateline Earth

Earth Ministry

EcoConsumer Blog

Faith and Environment Network

MomsRising

Publicola

Safer States

Sightline Daily

Watching Our Waterways

link
 
Info

Reading, writing, and toxic chemicals

— filed under: Parents and Kids, Safer Chemicals, Safer Products, PBTs, Environmental health, Toxic-Free Tips

Dry erase markers are easy to use in school, but they can also expose kids and teachers to unhealthy chemicals. Here's how two Seattle moms found safer alternatives to the stinky markers and convinced their school to use them.

Reading, writing, and toxic chemicals

Editors note: This post was written by Michelle Gaither, Environmental Engineer at the Pollution Prevention Resource Center. Michelle is a West Seattle mom, and an ardent environmentalist who works to learn about, implement, and educate others on ways to reduce chemical exposures at homes and school(s).

This past school year, while my kids were learning, several parents and teachers also learned a lesson about healthy classrooms and clean air.  At my kid’s elementary school, many teachers endeavor to save paper and efficiently teach a lesson via personal white board/slates and dry-erase markers. So, daily, in up to 15 classrooms, 24 or more students each open up a dry-erase marker, for 10 to 30 minutes, to complete a lesson on their own slate. 

I have often walked from the roomy hallways of the school, into a math class to help out, only to be blown over (and somewhat nauseated) by the overwhelming stench of dry-erase marker fumes.  Regular dry-erase markers contain solvents, and typical low-odor markers don’t seem to live up to their name.

I, for one, don’t buy the low-odor, non-toxic claims on the labels of some of the marker brands!  And, it is most certainly not a low odor level when 24+ markers are open and in use in close quarters at one time.

The students seem to have desensitized to the smell over time or developed “olfactory fatigue”; possibly analogous to the famous frog escapee after being thrown into boiling water, who wouldn’t have had the wherewithal to escape if the water had heated up slowly.  (I, entering the classroom from fresher air, would be the frog thrown into boiling water – and the students would be the frogs who started out in warm water but never escape).  

Another environmental issue with these markers is that they dry up fairly quickly, especially if not capped properly by young hands, and must be thrown out and replaced.  This is costly and wasteful. 

A fellow school mom (and WTC staff scientist, Erika Schreder) and I began conversing about this dilemma - out of concern for exposure of solvents to the students.  Through our pursuit of another way to teach, without the solvent exposure, we gratefully found and accepted a small amount of money from the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program of King County to try out some alternatives to the traditional dry-erase markers.  

For six weeks, we tried three alternatives: refillable, truly low-odor markers called Auspen® (in two classrooms), erasable white board crayons (in several classrooms), and paper and pencil (in one classroom where the teacher was previously suffering from headaches several times per week).

Our pilot study looked at functionality, cost, and odor level.

We found that three alternatives to regular dry-erase markers all reduced or eliminated improved odor levels, but the Auspen® markers won the popularity contest among teachers.

More specifically, we learned that:

  • All classrooms reported elimination of odor with the alternatives, and the teacher who had suffered headaches reported they stopped;
  • Paper and pencil eliminate all odors, but do cost slightly more than markers and slates; 
  • The Auspen® emitted no detectable odor during use, even when the entire class was using them; 
  • The Auspen® does require parental volunteer time for re-filling and re-tipping (or “re-nibbing”, as we call it), and, if they dry out – they tip is easily salvageable by adding new ink to the marker.  (No waste!) 
  • Only one classroom out of four opted to continue using white board crayons—they are harder for little people to erase, and leave a fair amount of waxy residue scattered about the classroom floor, slates, and storage containers;
  • An estimated 1900 dried-up dry-erase markers are thrown out annually (for a school population of 400 students);   
  • The cost of alternatives, from lowest to highest, is:  crayons, traditional low-odor markers, Auspen®, and finally paper. 

For the next school year, we have lots of teachers clamoring to get a set of the Auspens®.  We are hoping to find funding to purchase enough for all the classrooms that want to replace the old stinky markers with use them.  

For more information on this trial, visit PPRC’s rapid response webpage or contact mgaither@pprc.org.

Document Actions
  • Email this page
  • Print this
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
Washington Toxics Coalition
4649 Sunnyside Avenue N, Suite 540, Seattle, WA 98103
(206) 632-1545 : webmaster@watoxics.org
powered by Plone | site by Groundwire Consulting and served with clean energy